​Capstone Project Milestone 2 Vulnerable Population: Mental Disorders, homework help

Topic: Vulnerable Population: Mental Disorders

Capstone Project Milestone 2

Design for Change Proposal Guidelines

Purpose

You are to create a Design for Change proposal inclusive of your Practice Issue and Evidence Summary worksheet from your Capstone Project Milestone 1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

  • CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO #1)
  • CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2)

Due Date

Milestone 2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Submit this assignment to the Dropbox by the end of Week 4.

Points

Milestone 2 is worth 225 points.

Directions

  • Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the NR451_Milestone2_Design_Proposal_ template in Course Resources to create your paper. You will include the information from Milestone 1, your practice issue and evidence summary worksheets, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a practice problem you have uncovered that is significant enough to change current practice.
  • The format for this proposal will be a paper following the Publication manual of APA 6th edition.
  • The paper is to be four- to six-pages excluding the Title page and Reference page.
  • As you organize your information and evidence, include the following topics.
    • Introduction:Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). Introduce the reader to the plan with evidence-based problem identification and solution.
    • Change Model Overview: Overview of the ACE Star model (the model we have been discussing this session); define the scope of the EBP; identify the stakeholders, and determine the responsibility of the team members.
    • Evidence: Conduct internal and external searches of evidence; integrate and summarize the evidence summary worksheet from Milestone 1; develop a recommendation for change.
    • Translation: develop a hypothetical action plan; include measurable outcomes, reporting to stakeholders; identify next steps and disseminate the findings.
    • Conclusion: Provide a clear and concise summary, inclusive of the problem issue, the five points of the ACE Star change model; and ways to maintain the change plan.
  • Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means using peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.
  • Tables and Figures may be added as appropriate to the project. They should be embedded within the body of the paper (see your APA manual for how to format and cite). Creating tables and figures offers visual aids to the reader and enhances understanding of your literature review and design for change.

Grading Criteria: Design for Change Capstone Project

Category

Points

%

Description

Introduction

25

11%

Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified.

Change Model Overview

50

22%

Practice issue is identified and is nursing focused. An overview of the ACE Star model is given. The need for change is evident. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and their role are identified and discussed. Scope of the problem is identified. State how nurses should use this model as a guide to facilitate change.

Evidence

50

22%

Evidence is provided thru basic information that indicates a change is needed. For example, there have been 6 urinary tract infections over the last two months and there were none present the last two years at the same time period. What are some of the evidence-based interventions you discovered in your Evidence Summary that do you plan to use?

Translation

50

22%

Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described. What is needed to achieve. How do you translate what information you have gathered into practice? How do you inform staff? What is your plan of action to pilot the plan? What is the timeline?

Conclusion

25

11%

Clear, solid summary summarizing the key points and steps of the change plan is included; ways to sustain the change plan are described.

APA Format

25

11%

Minimal errors.

Total

225 points

100%

Grading Rubric: Capstone Project Milestone 2

Assignment Criteria

A (100%)

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

B (88%)

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

C (80%)

Meets

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

NI (38%)

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

F (0%)

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Introduction

25 points

Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, andevidence-based.Potential interventions clearly identified.

25 points ☐

Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based solutions identified but not clear.

22 points ☐

Introduction to the plan is provided; however, the plan is not nursing focused and evidence-based solutionsarenot convincing.

20 points ☐

Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not evidenced-based.

10 points ☐

Introduction is missing.

0 points ☐

Change Model Overview

50 points

Practice issue is nursing focused.

Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is present.

Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed.

Scope of problem is identified.

50 points ☐

Practice issue is nursing focused.

Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present.

Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed.

Scope of problem is identified.

44 points ☐

Practice issue is nursing focused.

Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present.

Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed but without detail.

Scope of problem is identified.

40 points ☐

Practice issue is nursing focused.

Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present.

Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are not discussed.

Scope of problem is identified.

19 points ☐

Change Model Overview is missing

0 points ☐

Evidence

50 points

Evidence is thoroughly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed.

Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

50 points ☐

Evidence is briefly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed.

Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

44 points ☐

Evidence is vaguely provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed.

Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

40 points ☐

Evidence is provided thru basic nformation of the current problem but is not convincing.

Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are not used in planning for change.

19 points ☐

Evidence is not provided thru basic information of the current problem; there is no indication of change; there no interventions listed from the Evidence Summary.

0 points ☐

Translation

50 points

Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described.

Ways to translateevidence into practice is discussed.

Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed.

50 points ☐

Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described.

How to translate evidence into practice is discussed but is not clear.

Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed.

44 points ☐

Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described.

How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed.

Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned.

40 points ☐

Activities to achieve final steps of change are described but not in detail.

How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed.

Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned.

19 points ☐

Activities for final change plan is missing.

Translation of evidence into practice is missing.

0 points ☐

Conclusion

25 points

Detailed summary of main points.

Ways to sustain plan are thoroughly described.

25 points ☐

Summary of main pointsis brief.

Ways to sustainplan are briefly described.

22 points ☐

Summary of main points is vague.

Ways to sustainplan are vaguely described.

20 points ☐

Summary of main points is vague.

Ways to sustain change are not described.

10 points ☐

Summary ismissing.

There is no plan tosustain change.

0 points ☐

APA formatting, scholarly writing

25 points

APA format sixth edition.

Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct.

References, citations correct.

Paper formatted in APA format.

No errors to one error.

25 points ☐

Two to three errors.

22 points ☐

Four to five errors.

20 points ☐

Six to seven errors.

10 points ☐

More than seven errors.

0 points ☐

Total Points

HMGT322 UMUC Physician Practice Management And Relative Value Unit Analysis

Case Study of Physician Practice Management/Relative Value Unit Analysis

Hide Assignment Information

Assessment #6: Case Study of Physician Practice Management and Relative Value Unit Analysis (15%) DUE-SATURDAY at Midnight

In this assessment, you will evaluate the physicians’ practice financial condition based on the following Relative Value Unit (RVU) calculations and analysis:

  1. Average and Marginal Costs per RVU,
  2. Total Average Cost,
  3. Total Marginal Cost per CPT code, and
  4. Analyzing the information to assist the physicians in using these costs appropriately and making informed decisions.

You will be graded based on your understanding of the calculations, the accuracy of your calculations, the validity of your conclusions and your ability to clearly communicate your analysis. To complete this assignment, follow these steps:

  1. Review the article How Management Accountants Make Physician Practices More Profitable.
  2. From this financial information, calculate the three RVU calculations:
  1. Average and Marginal Costs per RVU,
  2. Total Average Cost, and
  3. Total Marginal cost per CPT code.
  1. In proper APA format, write a 3-5 page paper (include a cover and reference page not included in page count). For each RVU calculation, in a paragraph:
    1. Calculate the costs,
    2. Show your calculations, and
    3. Write a conclusion about the physicians practice’s financial condition and discuss how you can assist the physicians in using these costs in making informed decisions.

*Please use headings for each paragraph and category to decipher the discussion and organize the paragraphs.

Use the following assumptions:

Assume that during the FY2016 year, Lovely Life LLC historical costs were $750,000 when 11,000 RVUs were produced and $950,000 when 14,000 RVUs were produced. The contract specifies that the number of RVUs per service CPT code are five (5).

High Fixed Costs

$950,000

#RVUs high point

14,000

Low Fixed Costs

$750,000

#RVUs low point

11,000

#RVUs per CPT

5

Projected #RVUs for the coming month

10,000

You will be graded based on the following rubric.

90-100

80-89

70-79

20 Points

The student demonstrates a thorough understanding of the meaning of the calculations and their applicability to the organization being analyzed.

The student demonstrates a reasonable but not complete understanding of the meaning of the calculations chosen and their applicability to the organization being analyzed.

The student demonstrates a limited understanding of the meaning of the calculations chosen and their applicability to the organization being analyzed.

The student does not demonstrate an understanding of the meaning of the calculations or how they can be used to assess the organization’s financial condition.

All of the calculations are calculated accurately

Only 2 of the calculations are calculated accurately

Only 1 of the calculations are calculated accurately

None of the calculations are calculated accurately.

The student draws accurate conclusions for each of the calculations and for the overall financial health of the organization.

The student draws some accurate conclusions for each of the calculations and for the overall financial health of the organization. There are a few mistakes

The student draws few accurate conclusions for each of the calculations and for the overall financial health of the organization. There are several mistakes

The student’s conclusions for each of the calculations are inaccurate and the overall conclusion on the financial health of the organization is not valid.

Writing quality: Writes clearly, concisely, and with few errors. Easy to understand. APA formatting and use of headings.

Writing quality: Writes with some errors but the paper can be readily understood. Minor issues with APA formatting. Use of headings.

Writing quality: paper includes numerous errors. Requires some effort to understand. APA formatting issues and no headings.

Writing quality: The paper is poorly written and is difficult to understand. No APA format and headings used.

Discussion

Discuss Supply Chain Management (SCM) in healthcare from the following perspectives:

  • Evaluate the roles of the key internal and external players involved in the success of SCM systems within healthcare organizations and explain how they interact.
  • Explain how SCM systems allow healthcare organizations to become more competitive.
  • Analyze the role that e-commerce plays in SCM. Support and justify your responses with appropriate research and examples.

Please follow all requirements and answer each question.

  • Include introduction and conclusion.
  • Please use Peer Reviewed Articles
  • APA format is required and each reference must be cited in the paper.
  • Use headings to organize the content in your work.
  • Please no plagiarism and sources should be 5 years or less.

Read the article and answer the questions.

  1. Read the article Pilot testing an educational intervention to improve communication with patients with dementia. WILL ATTACH
  2. Answer the following questions:
    1. What kind of communication technique are the authors suggesting for dementia patients?
    2. What technique seems the most promising to you?
      • Explain why you picked that technique?
  3. Your paper should be:
    • One (1) page or more.
    • Use factual information from the textbook and/or appropriate articles and websites.
    • Cite your sources – type references according to the APA Style Guide.

Why are you interested in Signature HealthCARE as opposed to another company

The questions are evaluated on the basis of content, writing skill and conciseness. Your answers should be double spaced and please make sure your full name is on your submission.

  • Why are you interested in Signature HealthCARE as opposed to another company?
  • What led you to consider a career in the long-term care industry?
  • What is the best advice you received but didn’t follow? Why didn’t you follow it? What’s the best advice you received but did follow? Why did you follow it?

Sir Winston Churchill once said, “Success is the ability to go from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm.” Share a story that illustrates this quote and tell us what that story reveals about who you are.

Ashford Drug and Substance Abuse Summary and Proposed Program

Vulnerable Population Summary and Proposed Program

The first of your two written assignments for the course will provide a beginning framework that you will utilize in the development of your
Final Project: a proposal for a community-based program in your area. For this first written assignment, you will select one of the vulnerable groups identified in the text that will serve as your target population of interest throughout the duration of your next written assignment and Final Project.

Select one among the following groups from Chapter 1:

  • Vulnerable mothers and children
  • Abused individuals
  • Chronically ill and disabled people
  • People diagnosed with HIV/AIDS
  • People diagnosed with mental conditions
  • Suicide- and homicide-liable people
  • People affected by alcohol and substance abuse
  • Indigent and homeless people
  • Immigrants and refugees
  • Groups for special consideration (you may propose a different vulnerable population at the consent of the instructor)

Once you have selected a group of interest, write a three page paper that covers the following:

  • Discuss the impact that at least two of the factors below have on the vulnerability of your chosen group:
    • Age
    • Gender
    • Culture/Ethnicity
    • Income
  • Analyze the intersection of social, political, and economic factors affecting vulnerability (must address all three factors).
  • Draft the design of a new model program, not currently existent within your community. Provide a two- to- three paragraph statement that introduces your proposed community program. This section is tentative and might change as you conduct more research. At a minimum, however, items to address should include:
  • An explanation of the issues and risk factors experienced by the selected population.
  • An evaluation of the health needs of the group and a proposed continuum of care level (preventive, treatment, or long-term care) based on the group’s issues, risk factors, and needs. Justify the proposed level with supportive research/evidence.
  • A description of one to two proposed services your program will include.

Your assignment should be a minimum of three pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and should include a minimum of three scholarly sources cited according to APA guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Chapter 11 Benefits of Computers in Healthcare Systems Discussion

After reading previous chapters and chapters 11-12 of your textbook, discuss the following:

  1. How have computers changed the way that healthcare is provided?
  2. Are there any disadvantages to having patient records computerized? Please explain your answer.
  3. Do the advances in medical technology really address the key issues of improving health?

Remember to cite your sources.

    • Your original post of 150-175 words is due by 11:59 PM, EST, Thursday of this week.
    • One peer reply of 75 words is required by 11:59 PM, EST Sunday of this week.
    • Before posting, check for spelling and grammatical errors. If I cannot evaluate your content, you will not receive points.
    • No quotes are permitted in this course in the discussion forums; use of quotes will result in loss of points.
    • Plagiarism is not tolerated. You must cite any sources you use to support your work. APA format is used in most health-related courses and professions. The SPC online library has a guide to assist you with your use of citations and referencing.

Climate Change Film Review on an Inconvenient Truth Al Gore

M5 Climate Change Film Review

For this assignment you will watch the Al Gore documentary An Inconvenient Truth. While the film is slightly dated, it remains a relevant and groundbreaking movie which reached a broad segment of the population. Copies of the video are no longer available for sale through the bookstore. Here is a link to Amazon, where you can inexpensively buy or rent the video An Inconvenient Truth. Alternatively, you may be able to find free versions at local libraries or on the Internet though most free online versions have been removed due to copyright.

http://www.amazon.com/An-Inconvenient-Truth-Al-Gore/dp/B000ICL3KGopens in a new window

As you’re watching the video, think about the following questions and then submit a 1-2 page review of the film that succinctly summarizes the film content and then addresses the questions below.

  1. What organization produced the documentary? Do you believe that this organization has a particular position on environmental issues?
  2. Is this presenting primary or secondary sources of information?
  3. What sort of language is being used? Is it factual? Sensationalistic? Emotional? Biased? Persuasive?
  4. What is the purpose of the video? Who is the intended audience?
  5. How recent is the information? Based on your readings and other research, what information or current thinking on climate change is missing? Does this distract from the overall value of the film?

Academic and Professional Integrity

-Academic and Professional Integrity?

Resources:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Chapter 1, “Writing for the Behavioral and Social Sciences”
    • Section 1.10, “Plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism”
  • Chapter 4, “The Mechanics of Style”
  • Chapter 6, “Crediting Sources”
    • Section 6.01, “Plagiarism”
    • Section 6.02, “Self-Plagiarism”
  • Chapter 7, “Reference Exa

-Glasper, A. (2016). Does cheating by students undermine the integrity of the nursing profession? British Journal of Nursing, 25(16), 932–933. doi:10.12968/bjon.2016.25.16.932

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

-Common APA formation and citting.

HCA340 Harvard University Managing in Health & Human Services Article

Discipline:

Medicine and Health

Type of service:
Article Review

Spacing:
Double spacing

Paper format:
APA

Number of pages:
18 pages

Number of sources:
10 sources

Paper detalis:

REVISION

I have attached everything the author needs to make this paper a success, including but not limited to, syllabus and grading criteria. It is imperative the writer follows each specific instruction since the school is very picky and can denied the paper for any reason that was mandated but not followed in the paper. The form attached RLRA 2, is my hypothesis proposal along with 10 article references. If the author wishes, he/she can also add sources that he/she deemed relevant provided they follow the criteria set forth by the school regarding sources, the article review must compare minimum 10 articles.
The writer has to compare and contrast the articles’ methods, results, and discussions. When in doubt refer to the syllabus and “guide to authors” forms uploaded. I prefer the writer takes it’s time if the instructions are followed to perfection. Any questions please dont hesitate to reach out. Thank You